Okay, time for my two cents.
First, I love this thread. This discussion has been outstanding, and I've loved following the twists and turns it's taken (Cyrus is EVIL. No, he's not, he's CLUELESS. No he's not, he's a GENIUS.)
I agree with a lot of what's been said (though not the evil part). This is a very young company with limited resources. Until a couple years ago, Cyrus was driving around from ski area to ski area
himself, trying to get people to try his skis -- so much so that some company (I think it was Marriott) even featured him in a commercial. All the same, he's done a number of things
brilliantly. First, he has a stellar product. I mean, seriously, these skis are amazing. They've racked up a ton of awards for technology, and I don't think I've seen one bad review. And second, he's gotten terrific press. The skis have attracted a ton of buzz without a lot of marketing. Sure, Renoun has a great web site , but as far as I know, they haven't run any ads (heck, I didn't even know they
had a catalog).
Do I personally, care that Renoun doesn't feature women? Sure, who wouldn't want to see women better represented in the outdoor industry? I think it's gotten better, but with few exceptions (Coalition, Title IX, and a few others), it's particularly male-oriented. Among avid skiers, however, I don't think it matters too much. To us, it's more important that a ski come in the models, lengths, and flexes we're looking for. That said, I think it's important for women to have more visibility. People of color, too. It sends a message about the company's priorities and who they value as customers. As far as Renoun is concerned, I'll second what some others have said: this is a young, small company with growing pains. I don't think their intent was evil (
let's leave women out!); I think it was a decision on where to concentrate resources. Sure, there was a bit of cluelessness, too. For example, when I first met Cyrus a few years ago, I could immediately tell why his skis were only available in really long lengths. The dude is like 6'6"! My son-in-law is the same height, and he's always putting stuff where I can't reach it. It's not because he's mean, he just doesn't see the world the same way as someone who's 5'1".
This isn't a free pass. I still think that pointing out the absence of women is important. Because even though I'm not offended in
this particular case (because the company is so new and small), I think in general, you need to acknowledge that we're out there, and not just as eye candy or appendages to men. I accept Cyrus's explanation that it will get better, and it will be slow. All the things that need to be done to change things cost money: building new ads, catalogs, etc. But I love that this has come up here, because the industry can see that we're watching. And that's important.
(I love that this discussion is going on in a forum that bans men, however. As always, I understand why it exists, but sometime the pot-meet-kettle aspect is just too much...)
Point taken. I make no apologies for this forum, but I wonder if this conversation would have gone the same way in a mixed venue.