cinnabon
Ski Diva Extraordinaire
Absolutely! There is no other sport I've put even remotely the amount of time and effort I have put into skiing. But I wonder if part of the reason I chose this is because I have some natural ability at it? Plus, as others have said, you have to be somewhat of a thrill seeker or risk taker to even want to do it. So although the hours and years of effort are essential, it's not like any random person off the street could necesarily decide to be a decent skier and be successful at it. I think it's a combination of putting in the effort and possessing at least some natural traits which are favorable to the sport.I guess I'm better at skiing than I am at other things because I put a lot more time into it than anything else. Malcolm Galdwell, the fellow who wrote "Blink," has a book out now called "Outliers, The Story of Success," where he explores what makes successful people successful. And one of the things he talks about (I haven't read the book, but I've heard him interviewed) is what he calls the "10,000 Hour Rule." Which is basically this: You have to put 10,000 hours into something before you get really good at it. That's essentially 10 years. As dloveski said, it's "time in the saddle." So if skiing is at all natural to me, it's only because I've done a lot to ingrain it into my muscle memory.
Much of this is true of me as well - if you substitute diving for track, that's my early resume as well. I think the balance needed for gymnastics and skating really helps with skiing. But yes, it was always the solo sports for me, and the only team sport I really played as a kid was softball, which is individual in a way in terms of what you are doing at any given time (as opposed to a team running down a field all chasing the same ball).Interesting discussion.
Out of all the sports I began before I was 18, I excelled in track, skiing, gymnastics, roller skating and ice skating. These are all basically 'solo' sports. Something about sports that combine speed and balance have always appealed to me and may be why I picked up mtn biking and inline skating later. I probably would have stayed with the mtn biking more if I didn't separate my shoulder at a crucial time in my skills development.
Golf and tennis - similar in terms of no real team participation, but the requisite hand/eye coordination was frustrating to me as a kid. Tennis I might try again but there is 0 interest for golf and I don't think I will ever like it.
Team sports were the worst for me - basketball, football, hockey... I lost interest before I could achieve any level of skill. Softball/baseball... the interest was there, and I had to systematically teach myself how to hit and throw effectively - it was not natural at all. Volleyball was the same, I taught myself because there was great interest and I believe it was the potential for co-ed fun that made softball/baseball/volleyball interesting enough to continue. You can argue that basketball, football and hockey could also be co-ed but there is something about the physical competition in these sports that made it less fun for me.