The reaction to the 4/2 NY Times article noted earlier in this thread has prompted a follow up article.
https://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/23/...at-a-misconception-on-exercise-and-bones.html
The NY Times author cites one meta-analysis study report (uses data from randomized clinical trials found in medical literature in 2010) and states that there are few large studies that look at the relationship between low level exercise such as walking and the risk of fractures, presumably focused on broken hips. In the 4/23 NY Times article states that the study conclusions found “'relatively small statistically significant' effect on bone density, 'there was no effect on numbers of fractures.'" The complete Conclusion of the cited study (following link in the article) is that "our results suggest a relatively small statistically significant,
but possibly important, effect of exercise on bone density compared with control groups.
Exercise has the potential to be a safe and effective way to avert bone loss in postmenopausal women." (bold added) As for fractures, the study summary noted that "There was no effect on numbers of fractures (odds ratio (OR) 0.61; 95% CI 0.23 to 1.64). Overall, the quality of the reporting of studies in the meta-analyses was low, in particular in the areas of sequence generation, allocation concealment, blinding and loss to follow-up." Clearly, the researchers understood the limitations of a meta-analysis.
At some point I came across the analysis done as part of the Harvard Nurses Study that included over 61,000 postmenopausal women. (The complete 2002 report in JAMA is available for free.) The way I read the conclusions, doing some walking is related to a lower risk of hip fracture. Since I was looking for exercises that help strengthen the spine, I did not read the full report. Granted, the difference noted may or may not be due to significant changes in bone density. However, I find it easy to locate clinical studies that support weight bearing and resistance exercise as helpful. A well designed small randomized clinical trial can provide useful conclusion based on appropriate statistical analysis. If that weren't the case, no new drugs would ever be approved if only large trials were considered valid. (If you are wondering, I worked as a statistician/programmer in the pharma industry before retiring and turning into a ski nut.)
Walking and Leisure-Time Activity and Risk of Hip Fracture in Postmenopausal Women in
JAMA, 2002;288(18):2300-2306. Diane Feskanich, ScD; Walter Willett, MD, DrPH; Graham Colditz, MD, DrPH. Author affiliations: Channing Laboratory, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School (Drs Feskanich, Willett, and Colditz) and Departments of Nutrition (Dr Willett) and Epidemiology (Drs Willett and Colditz), Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Mass.