Actually I commend their decision, and was actually a part of the discussion when they had the focus group. If you were in the room when discussion happened, you'd be saying...hmmmm, makes sense.Interesting that Fischer are going unisex, I may be wrong but it seems to me like a step back to "pink it and shrink it" times![]()
Pretty much true to size.The Maven sounds intriguing! I think I will have to look for that one to try this season. Did you find that it skied a bit short or true to size?
I do have the mavens in the fleet. I'll see what length they are but they may be a tad longer than you usually ski.I do recognize the jacket and have been enjoying it very much!
do you have the Mavens in the fleet?
I never have clicked with the Maven line--the ones with titanal a bit more than the ones without, but that Atomic Cloud series on Snowhot's feet==Pretty much true to size.
@contesstant skied several of the Mavens as well.
Perhaps you recognize the jacket. ;)
View attachment 21809
I still dream of owning a Cloud 12. The 14s were just enough above my pay grade that I wouldn't go that route. Holy crap that was a fun ski.I'm sitting in the North American headquarters for Fischer right now, as we are going over the 2024-25 line up.
They're still staying unisex with their line up, but with different flexes/sizes, but they are offering everyting in the Ranger and CURV line in two different colors, to appeal to different demographics across all genders. On the CURV line they'll be labeling one of the color options WS for women specific, however won't be pigeon holed for women only.
View attachment 21815
@contestant I remember you and I sharing notes about the differences in the C and Ti versions of the Maven line.
But the Clouds! WOW!
I would still love to give them a try. Any changes from the 23 -24 models other than graphics?I do have the mavens in the fleet. I'll see what length they are but they may be a tad longer than you usually ski.