The ski blogosphere has been buzzing lately with reactions to an opinion piece, “Pornstars in Powder,” in the Sydney (Australia) Morning Herald. In it, the author bemoans how women in various states of undress are being used to sell ski gear. “Call me old fashioned,” she says, “but I’ve never understood how a bikini, a bare breast or a naked woman in a canine position has anything to do with the performance, fit and ability of a ski boot to get me down the hill.”
All this is nothing new. I wrote about it here in 2006 in response to Julia Mancuso’s posing semi-nude in Lange ski boots. I get it. Sex sells. People like to look at women’s bodies. They’re beautiful. I’m not stupid; even I recognize that.
My problem isn’t that these women don’t look great. Or that they don’t have the right to do whatever they want. Or that I’m some kind of dried up old prude who can’t stand to look at naked pictures.
My problem is that this kind of marketing is so tired it almost makes me yawn. Cheesecake ads remind me of the kind of calendars you used to see on filling station walls. It’s so archaic and lacking in originality that it’s practically embarrassing. And okay, so I’m not the target audience for pictures of semi-clad women. But the ski industry does have women customers. And this type of ad makes us feel like we’re not valued as skiers; like we’re trivial and an interesting side show in the skiing universe. And I, for one, find that both annoying and demeaning.
For me, the best ad is one that points out why something is so incredibly great that if I didn’t use it, I might as well stay home. Show me Lindsey Vonn ripping down the slopes on a particular ski. That’s the ski I want to buy. Not the ad that shows ski boots as nothing more than a pair of bedroom slippers.
Which leads me to my next point. If you’re going to use someone like Julia Mancuso or Lindsey Vonn in an ad, why not take full advantage instead of reducing them to the same level as a Victoria’s Secret model (who probably doesn’t ski, anyway)? In case no one’s noticed, these are world class athletes. And instead of being celebrated for that amazing achievement, they’re sitting around in their underwear. It diminishes what they’ve done, it devalues them as individuals, and by objectifying themselves, they objectify the rest of us, too. Because if this what they have to do to get noticed, then there’s no hope that the rest of us will be taken seriously as women skiers.
This debate is far from over. There are always going to be people who think sex in advertising is fine, and it probably is for products like perfume, cosmetics; that sort of thing. But in skiing, I fail to see the connection. It’s unoriginal and effectively trivializes — and potentially alienates — an entire group of customers. Ski industry, you could do better.
If you’re interested in seeing what real women skiers think about all this, go here for a discussion on TheSkiDiva.com.
I agree. Sex is a tired advertisement. But ski ads in general are tiresome. Pictures of athletes with product placement doesn’t tell me much as a consumer. Furthermore, I recently read at geargals,com that many pro skiers (not racers, presumably) actually switch out their topsheets so they can ski a different brand of ski and not get in trouble with their sponsor. Ditto for ski boots and even clothing.
Let me just go on record… as a male in my late 20’s…. that I completely agree. The ski industry is lucky (in my case) that I buy ski gear based on web reviews and not advertising…because if I knew a particular brand was using sex to sell…I would refuse to buy the product. Unfortunately i’m in the minority. None the less, in spite of these athletes natural beauty. I am much more interested in their athletic ability than I am in their ability to strip. Lets keep skiing a family sport shall we?