I am fairly certain, in this example, the only difference is the binding. Even though they market the lengths to be different...they're not. As mentioned above, they also market the men's as a "more advanced" ski. It's all about what sells the best. Men tend to oversell their abilities, whereas women undersell theirs. This plays into the length they market them at...similar to how a price is always $199...not $200, the makes it seem not as expensive.For example, Belleayre has for demoing the "Rossignol Experience 82 Basalt w/ SPX 12 Konect bindings (men’s – 152, 160, 168, 176). I see from the internet that there is an Experience W 82 Basalt in 143, 151, 159, 167...is it just a length/color difference, or something more?
I'll keep you in mind!@TheGreenOne I'll be demoing the 159/160 length on Saturday! If I wind up liking them and you want someone to take your current ones off your hands...we should talk
Derp. Yep, mine is xpress system bindings on rail. It'll fit nearly any boot!@TheGreenOne I'll be demoing the 159/160 length on Saturday! If I wind up liking them and you want someone to take your current ones off your hands...we should talk Do you have the Xpress demo bindings mounted on yours?
I have the unisex 86 Ti with the Konect system and I can confirm that it's stupid heavy! Love the ski though.After @snoWYmonkey suggested it, I wrote to Rossi this morning. The official confirmation of what y'all said:
"Thank you for reaching out to Rossignol with your interest in our Experience 82 Basalt skis. Both the Men's and the Women's will have the same construction with the only difference being the graphic and the bindings mounted onto the system skis. The Women's will come with the Xpress bindings which are a bit lighter than the Konect system that comes mounted onto the Men's."