• Women skiers, this is the place for you -- an online community without the male-orientation you'll find in conventional ski magazines and internet ski forums. At TheSkiDiva.com, you can connect with other women to talk about skiing in a way that you can relate to, about things that you find of interest. Be sure to join our community to participate (women only, please!). Registration is fast and simple. Just be sure to add [email protected] to your address book so your registration activation emails won't be routed as spam. And please give careful consideration to your user name -- it will not be changed once your registration is confirmed.

Who's Your Sugar Mama? An 08 Atomic Review

snocat

Diva in Training
After an unrelenting quest for a mid-fat, I bought the 2008 Atomic Sugar Mama. This is from the new Nomad line. Candidly, I love Atomic and two weeks earlier purchased (and returned) the Nordica Conquer and Head Sweet Fat Thang. Additionally, I expect greatness from my skis, my legs and the world in general.

ME
5'7", 120 lbs., athletic, aggressive skier but free of major death wishes. I spend most of my time off-piste, enjoy occasional black groomers & bumps. Level 8 and obsessed with the all things "ski".

WHAT I NEEDED
I needed one ski to take me everywhere, with a focus on off-piste performance (Colorado, Utah). However, the snow gods can be selfish with their powder, so these skis must also be able to bust crud, hold an edge on hard pack and even be able to book down a groomer as my legs burn out.

WHAT I GOT
The Sugar Mama is the ski candy I have eternally quested. On the lean side of mid-fat, this 79mm waist (on a 164cm) delivered in ALL conditions. I stopped believing in one-ski quivers; but this changed all that. I skied 6 days of Vail and Beaver Creek in a vast array of conditions and was totally psyched after each outing.

Very easy turn initiation in even the steepest of spots (BC Talons), the Sugar Mamas bring a lightweight speed that had my husband cursing their name from far behind me. I was surprised by the Sugar Mamas snappy flex in bumps; it took a run to adapt to their torsion...however, this feature effortlessly delivered in tight trees and on big bumps. I like a tight turn radius, and the Mamas were right there with me. This surprised me as I was expecting to have to broaden my radius to get the most from these; no need!

On more serious steeps, the tails were perfectly sticky. No wash out here. They held beautifully and dutifully without ever impeding a pushing turn, though.

As a few flat run/cat-tracks cross everyone's path home, I was stunned to find that NOT ONCE did I have to propel myself with a pole or skating. The Sugar Mama is feature laden and still, ultra-light. I hit a couple of cat tracks I know I skated and poled on previous trips. On the Sugar Mama, say "hello" to friction-free glide! This is a minute point but delightful none-the-less.

Of note, though, the Sugar Mama is not dream ski for deep powder. Their float will get you through boot deep pow with glee; anything over true knee depth, you will not have a copious amount of float. They will get you through it, but with none of the finesse of a true powder fat. The laws of physics pretty much mandate that this is to be expected...but I still had to check.

HOT GIRL ON GIRL ACTION
Come on, you know a senorita cannot review a ski without a nod to aesthetics. The Sugar Mama sports a smoldering design. These are almost non-gender specific with a rich candy-apple red base. A deep, burnt red/ espresso graphic overlays; after much review, I still cannot entirely discern the artwork...roman mythological? Icarus? I don't know. As much as I obsess over the minutia, even I do not care about this one. However, I trust divining this answer will consume most of my summer months. The overall package is very hot. I have no aversion to total girly-looking skis. Bright pink O’Keefe flora? No problem. Puppies riding polka-dot unicorns? Fine. HOWEVER, I ended up really liking these "cha-cha" yet ballsy looking skis. Atomic went out on a limb with the totally amusing name; someone in marketing shrewdly ended the joke and delivered sleek, sexy graphics.

Completing the package, the 310-4Tix binding performed perfectly. The overall lightweight package is exactly what I needed, dreamed of and, personally, fantasized about.

This Nomad really does roam, delivering private thrills along the way. If it is out there, these skis will take you there. What are you waiting for? Everyone truly needs a Sugar Mama.
 

ski now work later

Ski Diva Extraordinaire
Angel Diva
Great Review!

ok, THAT was the most entertaining review I've ever read and it makes me want to go out and ski those babies. Thx.:cool:
 

SnowHot

Ski Diva Extraordinaire
Angel Diva
Love the review! Dang this site is going to break my bank. I just want want want!
 

num

Ski Diva Extraordinaire
Sounds like a great ride. And I just got a look at them, the graphics are sweet.
 

dloveski

Ski Diva Extraordinaire
I just got back from Solitude and "test drove" Sugar Mama's that the ski shop hooked me up with. Wow. I skied the 164cm length all morning in spring ski conditions (no pow pow) and they handled everything and were definitely a good ride. Overall, A.

Honeycomb traverse---fast but I felt secure (A+)

Slush in trees--plowed through fair enough (B+)

Frozen crud/steep---they dug in for controlled turns, with one or two backseat moments (it was the skier who struggled) (B+)

Groomers--they cruised on hard pack and on the slushies (A)

Turning ease--A or A+.

Bumps---a bit clunky on big frozen moguls in Honeycomb, but all skiers were struggling. Have to reserve judgement til tomorrow.

I have been on a quest for a play ski for non-powder days and I'm thinking these are the ones.
 

snocat

Diva in Training
DLove,
Your review could not have come at a better time. My Sugar Mamas and I are leaving for Solitude/Alta/Deer Valley on Thursday. I look forward to hitting up some ultra Spring (can you say "summer") conditions but was becoming very bummed about the weather reports. Your review has renewed my spirit and I am now busy selecting a bikini top to match my ski pants :D

The Sugar Mamas have a fresh warm wax and are ready to rock.

-SnoCat
 

dloveski

Ski Diva Extraordinaire
Wear your hawaiian shirt--it's warm.

I'm hosting at Solitude Saturday. Look me up if there that day.

Have fun and get some serious deck time in the sun.
 

trvlnut

Certified Ski Diva
So how does everyone feel about this ski now? It seems to be what I've been looking to buy since I ski Snowbird and Alta.

Gracias
 

Bravosarah

Ski Diva Extraordinaire
:spit: If your Sugar Mamas are as entertaining as your review is, you've got yourself a great ski!
 

dloveski

Ski Diva Extraordinaire
Lovin' the Sugar Mamas

So how does everyone feel about this ski now? It seems to be what I've been looking to buy since I ski Snowbird and Alta.

Gracias

What you said in your first post, and then some.

My Sugar Mamas do not disappoint. They handled the frozen tundra conditions in Honeycomb last season when I demo'd.

I got 'em for Christmas this year. Brand new and Snappy, speedy--they rocked on or off the groomers all day at Brighton. Making me smile all the way down. :thumbsup:
 

trvlnut

Certified Ski Diva
So my husband purchased these for me. Just want to know a few more things before we sign on the line.

1. How do these handle high speeds? Chatter? Squirelly?

2. What size do you think for me? He picked out the 150s, but I'm debating purchasing the 157s. I'm strong level 7 and 5'2" 109 lbs.

Gracias

BTW, I'll be coming to Snowbird this weekend to enjoy all the dumps!
 

greekpeakskier

Ski Diva Extraordinaire
i'd like to know how they differ from victory conquer and the sweet fat thang. how does the speed compare? how did they compare in the bumps and do you ski this length in heads and nordicas?


great, entertaining, thorough review.
 

dloveski

Ski Diva Extraordinaire
Both skis are wonderful. There is some overlap, but for cruising on hard pack, the Sugars can't be beat. Sugar mamas are quicker, more responsive, and ride sturdier than Sweet Fat Thangs.

The Sweets are great in softer, off trail, all mountain skiing when you need to switch from packed to powder in one day. They are not as quick, are not as responsive in a carve, but perform well, especially on days when you are exploring little pockets of the mtn, off trail.

The Sugars handle well in harder pack, groomed conditions, and shine on fast, long carves. but these, too, can handle most conditions, they are just more fun on harder surfaces and cruise control mode.
 

greekpeakskier

Ski Diva Extraordinaire
that's a great analysis. how about how it compares to the nordica?

thanks for your attention to these details. i really appreciate it.
 

trvlnut

Certified Ski Diva
I now own the Mamas in the 157s, but I demoed the Conquers for a week in December. The Conquers definately handle higher speeds better. They are more stable than the Mamas. The Conquers feel heavier to me so that makes sense that they are more stable at higher speeds. I'm not saying the Mamas are unstable at high speeds, but the Conquers definately are more stable.

The Mamas are better in bumps to me because they are lighter and quicker.

Of the two (Mamas and Conquers) skis, the Mamas are better in powder. However, I agree with the first reviewer when she states that when the powder is above boot level, they don't shine. I was skiing in mid-thigh powder a few weeks ago in Utah and I really had to lean back because the skis wouldn't float in that deep pow.

I haven't skied the Heads so I can't comment on them.
 

MaineSkiLady

Ski Diva Extraordinaire
I don't know about anyone else, but I was enchanted by snocat's writing style! :smile: Who are you, sc? Are you a journalist? This review is print-worthy. I'm not even in the market for skis, but after reading this, not only did I have a great "feel" for the ski, but I had a :D - PLEASE review more stuff for us! Anything! Your boots? A resort? Your favorite run? It's a total pleasure to read stuff like this. Really.

I can't do % to degree of slope calculations, but I know a writer when I read one. And now I want these skis!
 

jaydog

Ski Diva Extraordinaire
I demoed the Sugar Mama in a 157. I am 5'5", 130 lbs, and discovered that they were too short for me in that length. Got tossed around at speed in the crud, only seemed to want to make medium radius turns, and were only okay in moguls. I was bummed, because of all the rave reviews on this ski. They did zip along beautifully on top of the shallow powder that we had. So anyone trying to decide between two lengths, I'd recommend starting out with the longer one. Now I just have to find an opportunity to demo the 164....
 

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
27,558
Messages
526,360
Members
9,704
Latest member
mjskibunny
Top