• Women skiers, this is the place for you -- an online community without the male-orientation you'll find in conventional ski magazines and internet ski forums. At TheSkiDiva.com, you can connect with other women to talk about skiing in a way that you can relate to, about things that you find of interest. Be sure to join our community to participate (women only, please!). Registration is fast and simple. Just be sure to add [email protected] to your address book so your registration activation emails won't be routed as spam. And please give careful consideration to your user name -- it will not be changed once your registration is confirmed.

shaped ski technique question

treeskier

Diva in Training
Hi! I just found your website and am really excited to talk to women skiers instead of ski salesmen so I can get some real information. Yes, I am looking for new skis but before asking about brands in the gear forum, I would like to ask about the technique of skiing the newer shaped skis.

First, about me: I live in Colorado and ski Vail, Loveland, Breckenridge, Keystone, Arapahoe Basin, Winter Park and Copper. I am an Advanced level skier who would like to move up to the Expert level. I prefer to ski single blacks and lots of trees. I am currently on some 10 year old GS skis which are holding me back. You are obviously asking why I haven't bought new skis in 10 years. Its not that I am resistant to change or think my old skis are the best thing in the world. The real reason is that I had a baby six and a half years ago. I skipped a season then only skied one or two times the next two years since my kid did not do well with all day babysitting. When my son was three, we started him skiing. Not knowing any better, we took him on the lifts a few times and went down the hill - no problem. We then put him in ski school for a day where they used the little magic carpet. He was so bored, he refused to go back. He wanted to go on the lifts and the ski schools did not take three year-olds on lifts. And even if they would, I am basically paranoid and did not want him on a lift without me or my husband. So my husband and I taught him to ski. As a result, I have been skiing greens and blues the last few years coaching my kid and really had no need for a better ski.

This year everything has changed. I now have a six year old boy that can ski black diamond tree runs, can turn on a dime, searches for jumps and has no fear of speed. I hate to say it but my kid is faster than I am through the trees. I still have much better technique but I just can't keep up on old 180 GS skis, so the search for new skis has begun. So after that introduction, on to the questions.

I demoed some skis last season and not thinking to take a lesson, had some problems changing technique for the new shaped skis with no instruction on how to do that. I got a lot of chatter and tip waving. I think it is because I am running them too flat, because when I set them on edge they turn too much. I want an all-mountain/mid-fat ski that turns quickly *when I want it to* for going around trees in powder or on moguls. So I do not want a "cruiser/groomer" style ski. But, when I do packed powder blues, I want to go full speed fall-line with as little turning as possible, just a few large radius arcs. How do I do this on an all-mountain/mid-fat ski that wobbles if you run it flat but turns too tight of a radius if set on edge?

I read a post that stated that a particular ski was not good for moguls because it had too much side-cut. I am confused, doesn't more side cut = tighter turns = better in moguls? I do not love moguls and cannot do fall-line on them in my GS skis. Unfortunately, there is no choice but to do miles of moguls when you are on Colorado black runs unless you have a fresh powder day. Could someone educate me on sidecuts and why more sidecut is bad on moguls?

I have read about skiing the new shape skis and that you no longer weight/un-weight to make your turns but rather just move your hips into the turn to get your skis on the new edge. On hard-pack days you have trees, steep and moguls all together so you often don't have any choice where you turn and can easily get going too fast. I am used to the old-style technique where you slow down by dropping energy when you punch the sides of the turn. On the shaped ski/new skiing style how do you slow down/drop speed when trying to ski the fall-line (not by traversing or holding the turn till it goes uphill)?

I found some of the skies I demoed like the Rosignol Bandit B2s terribly soft or damp, with no rebound. They loved to carve full tight turns that slowed me way down but I couldn't figure out how to go fast on them. I do not know if I just need a stiffer ski or if it is just my old-style skiing technique that is confusing me. They felt like too much work. I have been looking for skis with lots of rebound but now that I have been reading that you don't need to unweight, do I not need rebound? What does rebound do for you in the new technique and is it something you want or don't want a lot of?

I have read a lot about how to do basic carving on shape skis but would appreciate any any other advice on shape ski technique for powder, moguls or trees.

Thanks!
 

volklgirl

Ski Diva Extraordinaire
Welcome treeskier!!

If you can, take a lesson on some demo skis. The instructor can help you with the technique changes required to use the new skis. Once you figure it out, you'll want to throw your old skis in the trash can!

Look at some of the all mountain twin tip skis. They tend to be easier to ski "on the flats" while remaining powerful carvers as needed. Even here in the icyish midwest, my Volkl Karma has become my go to ski for all but the iciest days. The groomer zoomers (carvers) with little waists and massive side cut tend to get ornery when not on edge and don't make the best skis for trees, bumps, and junk snow.

You'll also find that you'll probably want skis considerably shorter than your old ones, but don't go too short, especially on the twin tips.
 

MemilyG

Certified Ski Diva
Your kid sounds awesome.

You gotta give us some tips sometime about how to raise young rippers such as yours.

You sound pretty beyond my milieu in skiing, so I don't have specific demo suggestions. I demoed a couple of next year's Nordica women's line (W's HotRod Drive?). They seemed pretty beefy and giant slalomy, if that's the sort of thing you're looking for. Actually, the Fischer Vision Vapor might be down your alley - versatile on groomers/pow, likes long turns, stable at speed, performance ski. Best of luck!
 

perma-grin

Ski Diva Extraordinaire
katyperry is a member of the Divas. She is also a level 3 instructor at Copper mtn. How about sending her a PM and see what her schedule is like. I'm sure she could get you up to speed fairly quickly on the newer shaped skis. :thumbsup:
 

tamlyn

Ski Diva Extraordinaire
Hi Treeskier and welcome;
I am not far ahead of you. I had an injury and had to stop skiing for 12 years so all I had was my old racing skis, 203 Slalom, 212 GS and 223 Downhill. I was going to just ski them for a while but when I got my boots out I dropped one and it shattered into about 50 pieces so I decided to get new gear. I went through pretty much what you did at first but found that full bore racing skis in a longer length made the transition alot easier. First mogul skis are more like the old skis, not so shaped, look at the Rossi Super Mogul. As for the shaped skis remember you were an advanced skier on 180 GS skis so you may want to look at a 170 GS ski, or if you like glades a hybrid like the Fisher RX9 in a slightly shorter length than your old skis. The shorter the ski the softer it is going to be, in other words a RX9 in 150 will be softer than a RX9 in 170.
The new skis were developed to make it easier to learn to ski and has affected racing skis alot. New racing skis rely on the radius of the turn to carve and control by using shorter radius turns hence a slalom ski has a turn radius around 13 to 15 meters. GS about 33 to 35 meters, Super G and downhill skis are virtually unchanged, just a bit shorter because FIS rules have slowed down the race speeds. I demo'ed a Head 210 DH ski and then tried my old DH skis and my old ones are MUCH faster, but illegal under new FIS rules. Super G is more like an old GS than what a GS was 15 years ago and GS is kind of set like a loose slalom, new slalom courses are really tight compared to the way course setters used to set them. Park skiing has also had a big impact on skiing and as a result alot of "expert" skis are soft because that works well in a park, not so good at speed. Some advantages of the new skis are they float through crud and sierra cement alot better and I don't ski powder (I mostly race and like ice) but the new shaped skis are supposed to be much better in powder. You don't have to go crazy short, if you were on long skis you will most likely want a longer ski than a skier who never skied the older skis. I ended up getting 178s for GS 2 pair Volkl (P60s/ Racetiger) and Dynastar Speed Course pro Team, I am getting a Fisher hole ski for Slalom in a 168 (very stiff race stock) and will probably use the head 210 for Super G or DH if I decide to do any, they may be slower than they were but still 80MPH (before the new skis DH was occasionally exceeding 90!). Demo more agrresive skis than you might have, and my experience is the transition will be swift and painless. Two major things have changed, one is more hip angulation than knee seems to work and no longer do you have to keep ALL your weight on the downhill ski, although on Ice I still prefer to ski on one ski for most of the turn. You can still unweight just get a "snappy" ski, Fishers are good and Head liquid metal skis, also the Dynastar race series and some of the rossi's. Another gal here helped me grasp alot of the theory behind these skis and they are alot of fun once you get used to them oversteering (just don't complete your turns LOL) the ski does it for you. One bad thing about the new skis is the radical turn radius of the ski tends to want to "lock" you into a specific radius turn. I found the skis with not alot under foot (63 to 71 mm waist) are alot quicker edge to edge. I don't like real damp skis so while I love my Volkl P60s I really didn't care much for he rec skis I tried from them. Head and Rossi are both making some really nice mogul skis but they are closer to a more traditional ski than any of the other new skis. I haven't got a whole season under my belt yet so I may change my mind by next year but for now these skis seem to have made the transition quite easy.
Tami (gravity girl)
 

flygirl

Certified Ski Diva
Everyone on here is right as usual:} You need to get some demos and take some lessons. It will feel really strange since you are skiing "old technique". You are right..no more weighting and unweighting. But it's not about the hip either. It's just tipping the ski on edge using your ankles and the ski will turn:} That is what it is made to do. Your body is in allignment (called stacking) with your feet, knees, hips, shoulders, and head all in allignment. It will be hard to break some of your old habits, but with lessons and drills, you will get there. I recommend staying in the 150-154 cm length. I skied on 190 cm skis back in the "old days". Also, with these skis, your feet are approximately hip length apart..not close together like in the old technique. There is a saying, "technique follows technology", and it applies here bigtime. They also are no longer called "shaped skis". They are just "skis". LOL! They are much easier to ski than the old straight skis, and there is no "sweet spot" like on the old skis. The entire edge of the ski is the "sweet spot". :} Personally, I love the bumps, and like a ski with a good sidecut, and they are perfect in the bumps. I need a wider waist for powder and so demo on powder days. My ski works great though with fresh powder with a base. (4-5" of freshies. They are great in the trees! If there is a big dump, then I need the wider waisted ski, and will demo a powder ski, not a mid-fat. I would recommend the women's specific Nordica Olympia Firefox or Olympia Speed. I would also recommend the 154 cm length in them. But you definitely some lessons with drills to "unlearn" all you are used to doing and learn to let this ski do what it wants to do. It will be life changing for you and you will be skiing better than you've ever skied, and not even get tired! If you ski the ski correctly, then the 154 cm length will not feel too short for you. My Firefox skis are 146 cm. LOL! I bought them last season and had been on a 150 cm Rossi World Cup Exra Wide slalom ski. I love skiing short swing turns, but when I like to ski GS turns, these Nordica's rip! No chatter, no washing out..just perfect carved turns all the way! Be prepared for a lot of practice with the new technique..you will have to put it into muscle memory, and you've been skiing old technique forever. I've been skiing almost 50 years and have had to change technique over the years many times. But this is what skiing is now, and am I ever grateful for that! These skis make skiing so much easier and therefore a lot more fun when skied correctly. The B2's you mentioned are a good ski, but I skied them as a demo on powder days. I didn't like them on groomed at all. You are right..they are not the ski for you on groomed. I think "rebound" has been replaced with "lively". I like a quick turning ski edge to edge and a mid fat will not give you that. You said that you like the GS fast turns, so you really need a performance ski. Since you live in Colorado, I would also look for a powder ski. Something a bit wider under foot than even the mid fat. My Nordica's perform well with up to 5" of fresh snow. (as long as there is a base). The wider tips and tails are what enables them to perform well. Don't freak out about going so short..the skis still ski "long" when skied correctly. I demoed several pairs last year, and stayed in the 150 cm or so length. I really didn't like anything I demoed better than my Rossi's until I got on the Nordica's. I absolutely love them, and I'm skiing better than I have ever skied in my life! I do take a lot of lessons since I go to Taos Ski Valley for their ski weeks. The goal is to allow the ski to do it's thing and everything you do is very subtle compared to what we had to do in the old days. You just put the ski on it's edge and it will turn and on these skis that means faster skiing believe it or not. There is no unweighting, but there is a "stand tall". None of this will make any sense to you until you take some lessons, and I don't want to confuse you. Pole planting is different and on groomed runs when you are skiing fast, the pole is more for timing rather than a real plant. Arms are wider but hands still in front. In bumps the pole plant is back by your foot..not forward. There is also no shoulder movement. You only use your wrist to position the pole. I think you will begin to love the bumps once you learn the correct way to ski them on these skis. I find the bumps easier to ski than skiing groomed runs, since the terrain helps you to turn. I'm excited for you because you have no idea how much fun you will have once you start skiing "modern" technique:}
 

marzNC

Ski Diva Extraordinaire
Angel Diva
Thread starter from back in 2008 (see Post #1)
Hi! I just found your website and am really excited to talk to women skiers instead of ski salesmen so I can get some real information. Yes, I am looking for new skis but before asking about brands in the gear forum, I would like to ask about the technique of skiing the newer shaped skis.
. . .

Was looking around in Ski Tips and came across this old thread. Only 4 years old, but I don't recognize any of the skis mentioned. I imagine there are still some women who making the transition to shaped skis. When did they become the standard in ski shops?

I first tried a shaped ski in 2000. They were doing free demos at Heavenly. I was an intermediate who was not able to do consistent parallel turns on my basic straight skis but was confident on any blue out west. I found that my naturally wider stance (shoulder width) made the transition extremely easy. Had a blast starting with the first run. Made it pretty much a given that I wasn't going to be using straight skis again.

If you skied straight skis, how quickly did you transition?
 

Jilly

Moderator
Staff member
Shaped skis started out in middle 90's. They weren't quite as shaped as you see now. I had the X9's from Dynastar in 185, then went to the SF's in 176. They were more shaped and really should have been shorter. That was 2001 I think. I had them at Whistler and they started to scare me with the length. Tried some shorter ones while I was there and went to the Viper's from Rossi.

As for transition, I didn't have much of a problem, but I was also working as an instructor. So we had constant sessioning about these skis and how to teach on them. At one point I was one of 2 instructors at our local bump that could teach the CSIA - Fast track to Parallel. Pays to keep up on the sessions.
 

marzNC

Ski Diva Extraordinaire
Angel Diva
When my daughter started ski school in 2004, I noticed that they went from "pizza" to "french fries" as quickly as possible for kids who started at age 6 and up. I started at 4 with a couple ski trips to Massanutten. Seems like she was doing French Fries by age 5. Took a couple more seasons before the difference between "parallel" and "carving" started to make sense. We were only skiing in the southeast where there are relatively few people who really know how to carve.

Learning what length made sense for shaped skis was another part of the transition for me.
 

Pequenita

Ski Diva Extraordinaire
If you skied straight skis, how quickly did you transition?

I'm not entirely sure that my straight ski technique was that awesome to begin with, so I'm not sure if it was so much a transition as it was merely improving my skiing. :smile: Okay, I remember falling over sideways a lot, but everything else being pretty easy. And not having to worry about skiing with my feet together. Biggest shock, of course, was the length of ski decreasing. This last piece is particularly memorable because between 1993 and 2006, the only skis I owned were a pair of straight Rossi's in 175, and from 1999 until 2006, I rented. My skis kept getting shorter and shorter and shorter...
 

Jilly

Moderator
Staff member
Exactly - for most is was getting rid of the up and down motion. Just tip and go!
 

marzNC

Ski Diva Extraordinaire
Angel Diva
When my daughter started ski school in 2004, I noticed that they went from "pizza" to "french fries" as quickly as possible for kids who started at age 6 and up. I started at 4 with a couple ski trips to Massanutten. Seems like she was doing French Fries by age 5. Took a couple more seasons before the difference between "parallel" and "carving" started to make sense. We were only skiing in the southeast where there are relatively few people who really know how to carve.
I meant "I started her at 4 . . .". I didn't get on skis until age 12 and it was for only two winters. Long hiatus after that.
 

marzNC

Ski Diva Extraordinaire
Angel Diva
. . . Biggest shock, of course, was the length of ski decreasing. This last piece is particularly memorable because between 1993 and 2006, the only skis I owned were a pair of straight Rossi's in 175, and from 1999 until 2006, I rented. My skis kept getting shorter and shorter and shorter...

That reminds me . . . I went to a conference in Reno around 1988. Brought my ski stuff for a day at Mt. Rose. Went with a couple co-workers and a friend of one of them. The friend was probably 6 feet tall and had skied a couple times (from Florida). My straight skis were 160 (at the wrist) and he was given something like 140 at the rental place. Looked really odd to me!
 

MaineSkiLady

Ski Diva Extraordinaire
If you skied straight skis, how quickly did you transition?

Interesting thread revival!

The transition wasn’t bad for me - many of the early “shapers” were pretty moderate in their sidecut. After around 20 years on a straight 190, though, I came to refer to my new 178's as “stubbies.” They were K2 Four, and I believe the year was 1997. Mounted with my first/last/only pair of Marker bindings (NOT my favorite brand). A heavy set-up.

As Jilly pointed out above, the whole major up-unweighting thing was history, although many many many of us continued to do it, out of sheer habit. There were a number of good clinic drills that I followed, including stepping uphill with uphill ski just prior to the turn, to get the feel of the turn with skis “so much farther” apart. A major habit to break: the locked feet and legs! (Unless in moguls, of course!) The old 500 steps drill (constantly stepping uphill on the traverse) was another good one to practice (and still is today).

But one of my favorites, for dumping the up-unweighting habit: ditch the poles, get on a nice easy green, get way down, put hands on knees (gently!), skis at the “prescribed” distance apart, and just roll back and forth, going downhill at easy speeds. See that? No up-unweighting required!

Even after all is said and done, though, I can still usually tell if someone did their primary skill acquisition during that very long straight-ski phase.
 

tinymoose

Ski Diva Extraordinaire
What is up-unweighting?
 

ski diva

Administrator
Staff member
What is up-unweighting?

It's an upward motion used to help you turn in straight skis. Turning was a series of weight transfer movements -- essentially down-up-down. You'd actually rise up a bit, making your skis light at the height of the up motion. That's how I learned to ski back in the dark ages. It's no longer necessary with shaped skis.
 

tinymoose

Ski Diva Extraordinaire
That's interesting, because I think an instructor had me practicing something similar last year. Basically, I was flexing forward (down motion) going into the turn and then towards the end of the turn you stand up a bit more, flex less? Does this make sense? Unless you're talking about something completely different, and I'm not following. I'm not great at understanding things without seeing the motion described.
 

MaineSkiLady

Ski Diva Extraordinaire
What you’re describing is a variation of flexion (and sounds correct, in terms of the drill).

With up-unweighting, it’s far more pronounced - and happens at turn initiation.

Skis' current shapes pretty much take care of this for us now. The motion, however, is just another one of those skills that’s not bad to have in “the arsenal.” Up-unweighting is a key component of jump/hop turns - which can be life-savers in very tight, gnarly terrain.

I may not use all that “dark ages” stuff just on a fun cruise – but really glad to have the skill available at other times. It’s an exaggerated move by today’s standards, for when the skis have to brought fully around the turn, fast and deep - and super-short radius.
 

MaineSkiLady

Ski Diva Extraordinaire
A quick pic, at the height of up-unweighting: skis practically not even touching the snow, in an effort to make a tight turn atop mogul in some gnarly stuff - and avoid the tree stump just below:
ry%3D400
 

tinymoose

Ski Diva Extraordinaire
OK, that pictures is kinda freaking me out just looking at it. I can't quite wrap my head around taking a little "hop" of sorts on a slope like that. :eek:

Do they still teach up-unweighting at all as a survival skill?
 

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
27,564
Messages
526,485
Members
9,704
Latest member
mjskibunny
Top