• Women skiers, this is the place for you -- an online community without the male-orientation you'll find in conventional ski magazines and internet ski forums. At TheSkiDiva.com, you can connect with other women to talk about skiing in a way that you can relate to, about things that you find of interest. Be sure to join our community to participate (women only, please!). Registration is fast and simple. Just be sure to add webmaster@theskidiva.com to your address book so your registration activation emails won't be routed as spam. And please give careful consideration to your user name -- it will not be changed once your registration is confirmed.

Powder skis demo thoughts: Salomon QST 106 vs Volkl Blaze 104 vs Nordica Santa Ana 102

mzhang

Certified Ski Diva
Background: I'm an early advanced skier (5'4" 120lbs) who mostly stay on groomers but like to play on bumps and trees too. I don't have a lot of experience in powder skiing because I don't get many powder days every season. I have skiied on BP 88 at 158cm for the past few seasons and just bought Stockli Montero AW 158 and loved it. For the last two days of my trip, there was a huge snow storm so I decided to demo some powder skis.

Day 1: It has snowed a few inches overnight and continue to snow during the day. There were probably 7 -10 inches of new snow, but it was wet and heavy. Higher up the snow was better and dryer, while there were some melt and refrozen hard pack snow near the base.

Baseline: my BP 88. I started the day on my BP88 for two runs. I found it very unstable and hard for me to change edge under this condition. I could not trust my skis and was skiing very defensively.

Salomon QST 106, 157 cm: I immediately noticed the difference when I put them on. They felt much more stable than BP and surprisingly, they were much easier to turn and change edge as well, despite being almost 20 mm wider. This really made a big difference in my skiing. After a few runs, I went from not even enjoying chopped up blue to having fun on bumps and trees in black. The only weakness I noticed about these skis was that they felt chattery on uneven hard pack groomers.

Volkl Blaze 104, 158 cm: I enjoyed them as well. I found them to be quite similar to Salomon QST, but more agile and felted smoother to turn. They were really fun on bumps. However, they did not float as well as the Salomon in deep powder. They also had the chattery issue on hard pack snow.

I was quite happy with both skis after day 1. But I really missed the smoothness I felt on my Montero and wondered if I can find skis that performed better on powder while keeping the Stockli smoothness and precision. I was eyeing Nela 96 but I was worried that it wouldn't be wide enough for the deep snow condition. The rental person agreed with me and they recommended Nordica Santa Ana 102.

Day 2: It continued to snow overnight and during the day. There were probably around 5 inches of new snow. I arrived late and initially the snow was quite compacted on the groomers. But around 1pm, it started snowing hard and it was powdery soft everywhere. The snow was generally softer and dryer than the day before.

Nordica Santa Ana 102, 161cm: I was quite disappointed by them. I chose them because I felt chattery on the two skis the day before and was hoping the Santa Ana would solve that issue. However, I didn't find them to be particularly more stable and smooth than the Salomon, but felt much heavier and clumsier to turn. I was still enjoying the skiing, but I had to try harder on these skis rather than them helping me.

Overall, personally I would probably pick the Salomon QST as the best out of the three. The Volkl Blaze is also super fun for bumps and trees but I did feel they struggle a bit in deep powder. I'm still very interested in how Nela 96 would have performed under this condition. For people with experience on Nela 96, would it perform well on 10 inches of snow? I want something that doesn't overlap too much with my AW since I feel like my AW is already quite versatile and can handle a few inches of snow.
 
A friend of mine, who is a very advances skier and (not currently teaching) PSIA L3 instructor, has the Nela 96s as her daily driver in Colorado. She says they are not a forgiving ski and require her to be on her game 100% of the time, which she enjoys. She had some powder skis, I have no idea what, and ended up selling them because she found she was reaching for her Nelas unless the snow totals were in the double digits.

For what it’s worth, depending on where you ski, the 96 underfoot may be plenty. I caught a massive powder storm (40” over 3 days) this year, in Montana, and skid it on my daily drivers, which are the Santa Ana 93s. I was pleasantly surprised at how well they did for a relatively “narrow” ski for those conditions.

I did pick up a pair of Liberty Genesis 101s on mega sale this spring, as the Origin (the male version) is my SO’s daily driver and he loves everything about them, reporting they carve beautifully, don’t chatter, and play well in bumps and trees. He’s a FAST skier and used to compete in moguls, so he really pushed the limits of a ski! I haven’t skied mine yet (they don’t even have bindings yet…) so I’m unable to give a mere mortal’s report on them.
 
For what it’s worth, depending on where you ski, the 96 underfoot may be plenty. I caught a massive powder storm (40” over 3 days) this year, in Montana, and skid it on my daily drivers, which are the Santa Ana 93s. I was pleasantly surprised at how well they did for a relatively “narrow” ski for those conditions.
Definitely depends on how light the "powder" is on a given day. I had a great time on my 85 underfoot all-mountain skis on a day with completely fluffy powder and blue skies at Grand Targhee one trip not that long ago. The snow was over my knees since I'm petite. Of course, it made a difference that I've been out west enough in the last decade to catch a few powder storms. Also, I've had a few semi-private lessons that included some powder runs. At this point, I'm a solid advanced skier who is much stronger than twenty years ago when I started skiing more regularly out west . . . around age 50.

When I first started venturing off-piste on a powder day, it made a difference whether or not my skis were mid-80s, high 90s, or over 100mm. I was probably an adventurous upper intermediate. Most of those days were at Alta. Fast forward 5-10 years to a day I set up a lesson for myself and a friend that was going to be after a powder storm. Not that deep as I remember. I'd been working with the Level 3 instructor for several years during an annual trip to Alta. He didn't want my friend to have skis over 100 underfoot, and my friend is over 6 ft tall. By then, I'd skied with my primary ski buddy who can ski essentially any depth of fresh snow on his mid-90s all-mountain skis.

When I was renting powder skis at Alta, I generally got lengths that were longer than my all-mountain skis. With more tip and tail rocker, it can be helpful to have more length when skiing deep snow. Since I had experience as an intermediate long ago on straight skis way over my head, longer skis didn't intimidate me at all.

All-mountain skis at Grand Targhee, February 2019
TR Grand Targhee Feb2019 - 4.jpg

Powder tracks
TR Grand Targhee Feb2019 - 3.jpg

My powder tracks
TR Grand Targhee Feb2019 - 5.jpg
 

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
27,663
Messages
529,369
Members
9,752
Latest member
Gina Jausoro
Back
Top