Ranger 94 or 102 - keep.
Blizzard Sheeva 9 (maybe 10?) - keep. I will note that these love short radius turns. Great for trees and bumps. If you want long radius turns on groomers or long turns in open bowls, these feel less confident being held in the fall line. They're mounted a little in front of the Ranger and have more tail rocker, which makes them more nimble
Liberty Genesis 101 - keep, this ski competes almost head-to-head with the Sheeva.
Santa Ana 94 or 104 - keep. If the Ranger is a bit more directional and strong compared to the Sheeva, the SA 104 is that same step above the Ranger. I know a few people with Santa Ana inbound quivers and DPS Alchemist 100 / 112 touring skis.
Rip Stick 94 (maybe 106?) - I have the 102 (surprisingly the same ski as the men's 106, but a different mount point). I might scratch these. They added an extra layer of carbon since 2020, and the ski feels too stiff for its weight. With the Sheeva, the soft tips absorb chunder, but the metal underfoot is heavy enough to dampen it out. When the Ripstick deflects, it's such a stiff ski that it diverts the entire thing. Carves incredibly well. Nice in powder. Took a lot of work when the resort got skied out.
Blizzard Rustler 10 (maybe 9?) - keep, stronger version of the Sheeva, but otherwise the DNA is the same
Line Pandora 94 (or 104) - I'd probably strike this one off. I've had friends demo the Pandora 94 & Blaze 94 back-to-back. Consensus was that the Pandora skied super similarly, felt a smidgen more demanding, and that the Blaze felt a little more poppy. Considering that the Blaze uses fiberglass while Pandora uses carbon, that checks out. I don't know that it's differentiated enough to justify owning both, unless you're for sure going with the 94.
Black Crows Camox (96 ish) - keep. I have the Atris, which is part of Black Crows's "mix of directional and playful" family (the Corvus is not). They are extremely poppy. Little softer overall than the Ranger, little less density. Also mounted a smidgen up. I'd be really curious to see a comparison between those two - and if you're willing to pay for the Blister membership, I think they have one (birdie version is the same as the men's with a different topsheet. Product specs say it's a little softer, but the ceo of bc has confirmed theyre the same)