contesstant
Ski Diva Extraordinaire
I recall the 169 last year (in the 100) being WAY too much ski for me, and I ski the 169 pre-titanal version just fine (except yes, in tight spaces, it's a lot of length to get around.) I cannot recall if I skied the 93 in a 161 or 169.
All I know is that the 88 in a 165 is MONEY for me. I skied it this afternoon in horrible flat light, about 2 to 3 inches or up to 8 inches (windbuff, that I couldn't see until I was IN it) scraped off in spots, and giggled a lot. They are a BLAST.
All I know is that the 88 in a 165 is MONEY for me. I skied it this afternoon in horrible flat light, about 2 to 3 inches or up to 8 inches (windbuff, that I couldn't see until I was IN it) scraped off in spots, and giggled a lot. They are a BLAST.