• Women skiers, this is the place for you -- an online community without the male-orientation you'll find in conventional ski magazines and internet ski forums. At TheSkiDiva.com, you can connect with other women to talk about skiing in a way that you can relate to, about things that you find of interest. Be sure to join our community to participate (women only, please!). Registration is fast and simple. Just be sure to add [email protected] to your address book so your registration activation emails won't be routed as spam. And please give careful consideration to your user name -- it will not be changed once your registration is confirmed.

How wide is too wide?

abc

Banned
Imagine this scenario:

It's Friday. And you're all packed for a week long ski trip half way across the country (or across the world). And you make last check of the weather for your destination. Lo-and-behold, they predict a dump in 48-72 hours, 1-3 ft!

You have the chance to swap out your "all-mountain" ski for your powder plank. But the reason you had it in your bag was, the condition is currently "hard-pack". And it'll stay that way for the next 2 days still, till the snow comes. So you REALLY do need a REAL all-mountain ski, only one that will let you REALLY enjoy the powder, not just struggle in it. What would you take? (assuming you can have any ONE ski you want, but just ONE)

*****************

Only the question is hyperthetical in a sense I don't have the skis yet, but I'm looking for one that can go in the bag in situation like that.

And the scenario is every bit as real. I was half way around the world when a foot of snow fell on day 2, and another foot on day 4, with 2-4" all the other days in between. What I found was the "midfat" (of ~75mm) I rented at the resort was barely enough to lfoat my boat (literally)! So if I'm going to own my own for situation like that, I'd be better off going a bit wider than 75mm, right?

But how wide should I go? How wide is too wide for the groomers, though? I'm sure a 90mm waist would be great for the bottomless powder. But until the storm came, there wasn't much base to speak of. So, man-made hardpack was the expectation. And in fact, due to poor visibility, we were limited to the groomers for 2 of the days because the only thing to stop us from going accidentally into the next valley were the trail markers lining the groomer runs. And the snow on it got skied out pretty quickly, down to the man-made base. And the "mid-fat" chattered madly on it.

What's the compromise ski that would be wide enough to let a (near) powder virgin to enjoy the powder without struggling too much, and still perform adequately on trail?

I know, I know, I ought to get my skill up to the task instead of just buying another ski. But honestly, how often do we east coasters get real fluffy, bottomless powder to pratice on? I'm afraid I AM looking for a quick fix to allow me to enjoy the freshies without having to put in weeks and weeks of snow time to learn to ski powder I may never again see more than another few days the rest of my skiing life!

Thanks, in advance, for all your input.
 

ski diva

Administrator
Staff member
I had a similar situation during our Diva Day at Jay on March 17. All I had with me was my 70-waist Heads, and we had a 40-inch dump of the lightest, fluffiest, most beautiful powder you ever saw. Like you, I'm an eastern skier; my exposure to stuff like that is minimal, at best.

So instead of struggling through it, I demoed fatties. Gave me the skis I needed for a short time, with very little investment. And wow, was it fun! Got to try a couple different skis while having a blast. I highly recommend it.

'Course, now I'm hooked and I have to buy. So I'm getting a pair of Queen Attivas. These have an 87-mm waist so they're good in powder, the groomers, and the soft stuff we're facing now.
 

altagirl

Moderator
Staff member
Okay, I'm not an east coaster.

BUT - I have no problem at all skiing 105mm waisted skis on groomers, on anything short of real ice.

To me, a 90mm waisted ski is a good everyday type of ski (i.e. hasn't snowed in a while, but it's not ice). They work okay in powder, but a real powder ski (at least 100 underfoot) is much better. My new powder skis are 136 underfoot (obviously not a purchase for your one ski quiver).

That said, I'm not the type that can pick one ski. I just bought a sixth pair that will be in the active rotation. If I did have to pick one pair, I think I'd go with my Head i.M.88s, since they seem to do best all around.
 

volklgirl

Ski Diva Extraordinaire
If I could only have 1 ski it would definitely be my Karmas. With an 87 waist, they handle everything but the iciest conditions and hard bumps with aplomb. They even float my fat a** in up to 2' of pow. :D Carving on the hard stuff merely takes patience and commitment.
 

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
27,564
Messages
526,452
Members
9,704
Latest member
mjskibunny
Top