Calling all K2 Burnin Luv owners...

[CMCM]

I'm really really tempted to get a pair of Burnin Luvs....I've found a couple of super super deals on this year's model, and an even better deal on some from the year before....I don't think there is any difference in the two except for color.

SO.....Since I haven't demoed them, could those of you who ski them tell me more about how they ski? I know they have a metal sheet in them, so how does that affect things, if at all? I had always thought they were a highly advanced ski, but that doesn't appear to be the case from what I've read various places this year.

I'm also wondering about length....since these are a carver ski with a narrow waist, I wouldn't want to go as long as I might on a wider ski, right?

Anyhow, I'd like some info on how the Burnin's perform in general, on different types of snow, edge grip, ease of turning, stability,and so on.

Thanks!

 

[PowDiva85]

if you love groomers and ski at higher speeds these are great skis for you. They are 70% frontside 30% backside ski..although honestly unless you are really petite the waist is too narrow to handle more than a few inches of fresh. The metal sheet in the ski makes them more damp which means they will feel more stable at higher speeds but you will loose some "pop" when compared to a lighter weight all wood core ski. I skied these on a day where they hadn't gotten any snow for a day or two and so I was only on groomers and they were awesome. I wouldn't recommend them if you are looking for a bump ski though because they are too stiff in my opinion. As for the length I ski my carving skis longer than my powder skis ie. a 160 vs. 154 but thats just my personal prefrence, generally if you consider you self and advanced skier your skis should hit somewhere between nose and eyebrows. What skis are you coming off of?

 

[SkiNurse]

This was my 5th or 6th season with my Burnin' Luvs 160cm. Remember, a K2 160cm will be longer than other skis in a 160cm. They don't measure tip to tip, they measure skiable area. So, consider that when you are buying a K2. I went with the 160cm cuz my T9 Flights were 167s and I didn't want to drop down too small.

My Burnin' Luvs are fabulous in more than a couple of inches of powder. I have skied knee to thigh deep w/o any ski issues...just skier issues! They perform very well in crud & have a great edge for the hard pack/steeps. They are a very fast ski. Ihave to really watch my speed on the groomer or hard pack. I don't like them as much in the bumps or in the trees as my Lotta Luvs. The Lotta Luvs seem to be just a wee bit more responsive. That being said, the Lottas are a more agressive ski...the ski almost wanted to ski me @ first! The Burnin' on the other hand, seemed that even if I am tired or just generally off my game, they know exactly what do..almost like they have an auto pilot function! The Burnin' ski well in slush.

I also normally ski in Colorado (poor me!). So some of the performance of the ski might depend on what type of conditions you are "normally" in.

In summary, I LOVE my Burnin' Luvs. That have been a fabulous ski for me for many seasons.

 

[Native Vail Gal]

I've skiied with SkiNurse with her Lotta Luvs (R.I.P.) and when I asked her about them, she replied by saying, "I LOVE them....but I kindof miss my Burnin' Luvs!" I think she jinxed her Lottas with that comment!

 

[SnowHot]

I haven't been on the current model K2BL's. The 05 models I had were stable, fun and could carve like no body's business, but they definitely had a speed limit.

FWIW I am confident the technology has changed a bit since the 05 model.

My personal recommendation to you, after having skied with you a touch at Stowe, I'd say try the Volkl Fuego or the Nordica Firefox.

 

[Shellski]

This was my 5th or 6th season with my Burnin' Luvs 160cm. Remember, a K2 160cm will be longer than other skis in a 160cm. They don't measure tip to tip, they measure skiable area. So, consider that when you are buying a K2. I went with the 160cm cuz my T9 Flights were 167s and I didn't want to drop down too small.

My Burnin' Luvs are fabulous in more than a couple of inches of powder. I have skied knee to thigh deep w/o any ski issues...just skier issues! They perform very well in crud & have a great edge for the hard pack/steeps. They are a very fast ski. Ihave to really watch my speed on the groomer or hard pack. I don't like them as much in the bumps or in the trees as my Lotta Luvs. The Lotta Luvs seem to be just a wee bit more responsive. That being said, the Lottas are a more agressive ski...the ski almost wanted to ski me @ first! The Burnin' on the other hand, seemed that even if I am tired or just generally off my game, they know exactly what do..almost like they have an auto pilot function! The Burnin' ski well in slush.

I also normally ski in Colorado (poor me!). So some of the performance of the ski might depend on what type of conditions you are "normally" in.

In summary, I LOVE my Burnin' Luvs. That have been a fabulous ski for me for many seasons.

This could almost have been my response SkiNurse, except I don't love my Lottas in any conditions.

I'd definitely call them an advanced ski, but they are hugely forgiving.

I have skied mine in up to knee deep snow, and they handle it very well, no real issues (with the ski...) in bumps.

I've had mine (first edition) for some time, and nothing else I have demoed makes me want to replace them. Maybe I'll just upgrade the Burnin's to the new model.

Mine are 160, I'm 165cm (5'5), and not light. I'd say they are the perfect length.

 

[marta]

I bought mine without demoing and have been more than happy! I got the 146, but I'm only 4'11. Look for my review from last year in the gear reviews.

 

[oragejuice]

One of my roomates skis them, in Alaska. She looooves them to death. I considered buying a pair, but I'm a brand-whore (Volkl) and couldn't make myself do it.

 

[Shellski]

One of my roomates skis them, in Alaska. She looooves them to death. I considered buying a pair, but I'm a brand-whore (Volkl) and couldn't make myself do it.

I used to be that way with Atomic, then they lost me at Metron..

:mad:

 

[Acrophobia]

Burning Luv's have a huge sweet spot and are very forgiving. They're an excellent ski for someone who's looking to perfect their carving skills on the groomers. I haven't noticed a "speed limit" as such. I think they are very stable at speed, actually. I have the 160s.

As for their performance in deep snow...well, if your technique is perfect, you can probably ski anything in them (the Epicski theme song - "it's not the ski, it's the skier!"). However, if you want a little "help" moving into the off-piste, a wider ski might be better.

 

[astridhj]

I just bought the Burning Luv in 167 since I got a great deal on them. Haven't demoed them and I really wonder how they will be on the slopes. Can't wait till winter so I can test them out. Hope they will be great.

Being on summer holiday and just passing through Mammoth and going inside a ski shop can be dangerous

It's time to go out and enjoy the sun by the pool in Las Vegas and continue on Finn. I finally got my hands on that book

 

[jac]

I have a pair of burnin luvs 2008. The metal gives them more go, so you need to be an experienced skier to enjoy them. In New Zealand, the runs are quite narrow compared to America and Canada {jeolous}. The best bet is to take the advice other divas give, and either demo or hire. It's the only way to know if you are going to like them. I have made the mistake in the past - of buying skis on reviews alone. Trust me - it can be very expensive. And the worst thing is, you go out of your way to beat the ski and don't enjoy skiing to the same degree. Hope this has helped.