That's the case now. But what about in 2-3 years after Vail Resorts puts money into Stevens? John Kircher is not that young. His son is 26 and not quite experienced enough to take a lead role. John knows first hand the amount of work and money it will take to continue making needed improvements to Crystal so that it remains competitive for the next 10-20 years. He knows what it took to make Big Sky successful after buying it for Boyne Resorts and running it for quite a while.https://www.rei.com/blog/snowsports/why-john-kircher-decided-to-sell-crystal-mountain
I still don't get it. Stevens are Crystal are totally different directions from Seattle. They have different amenities and attract different crowds. It's not even possible for Stevens to take all the business because they have parking lots that fill if you aren't there by 10.
I've never before been able to ski another area at the same cost as my season pass at my home mountain. So maybe Alterra is also "buying" pass holders. I ski Tremblant as my home mountain, but with the Ikon, now I can ski other places at no cost for lift tickets.
Sometimes perception is reality. Vail Resorts bought three ski areas in the midwest. A bunch of money was spent to upgrade lifts and lodges in the first few years after the changes from family owners to VR. Those are are still fundamentally small ski hills that are very crowded on weekends. But I bet all the other ski hill owners in the region are feeling pressure to compete against the Epic pass.I just can't imagine that Vail could do anything to it that would hurt Crystal's business.
From a business standpoint, it's not just about winter sports. Begin part of Vail Resorts will make it easier for Stevens to expand summer activities. Crystal has to compete year round with Stevens. Financial success in the long run may well be based more on summer revenue than winter revenue. I know that's true in the southeast and Mid-Atlantic. Seems to be the case in New England as well but I've only been paying attention to that region for a few years. The successful ski areas that have no lodging have solid summer activities, even if the ski terrain quite limited. Meaning under 300 acres total, with no off-piste terrain at all.I don't mean to downplay how tough it is to run a ski resort. But that's part of it – – Stevens isn't a resort, and it never will be. It can't be anything more than a day use area, and one that is also very limited by the fact that they can't build any more parking.
Alterra needed to get a foothold in the PNW and everyone has their price.
As to parking ... are shuttles a possibility from parking down below?