• Women skiers, this is the place for you -- an online community without the male-orientation you'll find in conventional ski magazines and internet ski forums. At TheSkiDiva.com, you can connect with other women to talk about skiing in a way that you can relate to, about things that you find of interest. Be sure to join our community to participate (women only, please!). Registration is fast and simple. Just be sure to add [email protected] to your address book so your registration activation emails won't be routed as spam. And please give careful consideration to your user name -- it will not be changed once your registration is confirmed.

2007 Volkl Aura

volklgirl

Ski Diva Extraordinaire
I will be doing a multi-day review on these as I get some time on them in varying conditions, so stay tuned!

Here is my review of the 2008 Aura in a 163 and the 2008 Mantra in a 170 for comparison.
:booboo: My 2008 Aura review includes an error in the ski's dimensions.....only the Mantra was widened for 2008, so the dimensions on the 2008 Aura should read the same as the 2007 version - 130-94-113, NOT 133-96-116, sorry 'bout that.

I decided to go with the 177cm for out-west use and those rare deep or really gloppy days in the midwest. My runs today confirmed my original opinion from trying the 163cm that the longer Auras are just too much ski for any of our little bitty bumps. However, I already have my Karmas for most soft snow conditions here.

On to the review!
The Tester: 190+ lbs, 5'5", 42 Years old, PSIA Level II, Platinum/Gold level Nastar and 2x/week league racer. I prefer stiffer skis with lots of pop that can handle my preference for high speed ripping.

The Conditions: 35 deg dropping to 28 deg. Bright sunshine. Firm-to-icy harpack everywhere except where the sun had been shining all day. The sunny spots had 2-5" of mashed potatos over a crunchy base. As the sun went down and the temperature dropped, everything got really crispy and set-up.

The Test Runs: All over the mountain! Greens, blues, blacks, slow, fast, medium, skidded turns, hop turns, big honkin' carvers.

The Ski: 2007 Volkl Aura 177cm, 130-94-113 23.2m radius at 177cm
Mount: Marker 1200 Titanium w/ Piston Control, mounted 3/8" back of boot center mark (for improved pow and crud performance and to avoid drilling an entirely new set of holes).
Impressions: The first thing I noticed was the sound that they made when hitting the harder chunked-up snow in the shade. Where most Volkls have a deep, solid wood-bat-hitting-a-softball "thwwwunk" sound, the Aura had more of an aluminum-bat-hitting-a-baseball "twaaaaank" sound. It was just odd, but turning up the tunes soon drowned out the sound. :cool:
The next thing I noticed was their soft snow performance. All I can say is O M G!!!!! :thumbsup: Their preferred method of dealing with crud is to plow through at mach speed. No matter how lumpy or deep it got, they just motored through without a wiggle, a squirm, or a twitch. They were rock solid yet still light and lively feeling. The Aura had the power and aplomb of the Mantra without the heavy feeling I experienced from the Mantra. How did Volkl manage to make a freight train ski that doesn't feel like a freight train????:noidea: Serious Kudos for this!!!:thumbsup:
Even at this length, the Aura was a breeze to hop turn but skidded turns and shorter carved turns took a bit more work. I had the distinct feeling that the back mounted bindings were a noticable hinderance to their hard snow performance (but that's OK because I have carvers already).
As the sun set and the snow hardened up, I found the Aura to be almost too lively for me. The combination of their light weight and considerable stiffness made them almost vibrate underfoot at speed on the hard stuff. That isn't necessarily a bad thing, just a little odd - I'm not used to being on light weight skis so it felt weird. They were still rock-solid though. Turning the Piston Control switch on the bindings to "On" quieted them right down and made them perform like race skis. In giant high speed arcs they were smooth, smooth, smooth with plenty of pop.

The best thing?? They made me want to get air off of every little bump and jump I could find! :ski2: After trashing my race skis in January by landing badly off a roller jump, I've been deathly afraid of getting air all year. Today on the Auras was a refreshing change. :becky:

In a Nutshell: At this length - a well mannered and fun big mountain beast with plenty of guts! This ski is a high speed joy ride that rewards commitment, aggression, and good technique with an uncomparable ride and a sh*t-eating grin, but doesn't punish the ocassional lapse either.

Special Thanks to: My darling hubby who found them, purchased them, and mounted the bindings for me!
 

ski now work later

Ski Diva Extraordinaire
Angel Diva
Volklgirl, congrats on your new sticks!

I also experienced the "wanna take air" thing while on my new Auras and think they will be a great park and pipe ski. They amaze me in terms of their "bombproofness" in varied conditions and they make short radius turns pretty easily too. I ski faster on mine than any other ski I've used.

Enjoy! Will they have to wait until next season to travel West or are you joining the A-Basin Mother's Day weekend Diva gathering?
 

SkiGAP

Ski Diva Extraordinaire
Angel Diva
I want! I can't find any to demo around here, and so far where I've seen them in the shops only the 163s are left (I think I would like at least 170). I may try the Bridge tomorrow (my ski school has them), just to understand *how* different such a width will feel compared to my Burnin's. And who knows, maybe I'll like it. But I'll keep looking for Auras. In any case, Congrats!
 

volklgirl

Ski Diva Extraordinaire
I want! I can't find any to demo around here, and so far where I've seen them in the shops only the 163s are left (I think I would like at least 170).
You can find the 163 to try??? Amazing - that size has been sold out around here for months! Give it a try, though, I think you'll be pleasantly surprised.....it skis MUCH bigger than its size would suggest.
---------------------------------------------------------------
THE AURAS, DAY 2

The Conditions: 12:30, 35 deg, nicely groomed with top layer just beginning to soften. 2:30, 43 deg and bright sunshine. 2-4" of slush puppy and mashed potato snow over a soft groomed base. By 4:30 there was ankle to boot-top slush puppy piles all over the mountain. In other words, :eek: for most people.

Impressions: My vocabulary just isn't big enough to express my opinion of these skis today :love: . I've totally run out of appropriate superlatives.
So, :ski2: :yahoo: :becky: :ski: and :fireworks: will have to do.
Earlier in the day, pressing down on my toes and driving my knee forward and in turned them into the superlative groomer-zoomer. As the snow softened up, they slithered through the bumpy piles, powered through the deep glop, and gave me the best bump run of my life! I even did a run down "Nose Dive", which I've only ever done twice before, and only one of those times didn't look like this . They were perfectly happy to make any size turn at any speed whether carved, scarved, or skidded. :help: I've fallen in love again.

In a Nut Shell: :faint: I never, ever expected to fall madly in love with these skis at this length. As soon as I quit thinking about it and started just skiing them instead, they came to life and burrowed their way into my heart. I spent all day trying not to get "frozen tongue" :p because it just kept hanging out of my mouth while I laughed, whooped, and giggled my way down every run :becky: .

Just because our runs here are soooo short, I don't think I'll be getting rid of my Karmas any time soon. But, I may have found a new go-to ski for sping skiing and our occasional powder days.

If you haven't yet tried the Aura, you owe yourself that treat. Just remember, if you don't ski it, it will ski you. :thumbsup:
 

SkiGAP

Ski Diva Extraordinaire
Angel Diva
You can find the 163 to try??? Amazing - that size has been sold out around here for months! Give it a try, though, I think you'll be pleasantly surprised.....it skis MUCH bigger than its size would suggest.

To be clear, I have seen the 163s in plastic in one of the shops around here, but none to demo at any length. I'd certainly try the 163 OR 170 OR 177 if I could.
---------------------------------------------------------------
Earlier in the day, pressing down on my toes and driving my knee forward and in turned them into the superlative groomer-zoomer.

A motion my instructor always works on with me, so I am ready!

---------------------------------------------------------------
only one of those times didn't look like this .

I certainly know *that* look and feeling...


By the way, I had to ski in that deep, heavy slush yesterday (Saturday) as the lower slopes were getting warm...didn't like it, but survived. :(. I'll be back out there today (leaving in about 30 mins) - the slopes were EMPTY yesterday, I hope to have the same luck today.

VG, Glad you love your Auras!:clap:
 

pinto

Ski Diva Extraordinaire
I never, ever expected to fall madly in love with these skis at this length.


:thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup: :thumbsup:

My sentiments exactly. When I bought them, I thought they would be much more of a specialized ski, at that length. (Mine are also 177.) Now, whenever I'm on my other skis, I wish I were on the Auras. There has hardly been a snow condition where I haven't felt that way. Actually, frozen moguls, maybe. But I'm not positive.
 

ski now work later

Ski Diva Extraordinaire
Angel Diva
My Auras didn't give me quite the optimal bite in skied off hardpack in Northern VT last week. My Attiva AC2s performed better in those conditions. That said, the Auras excel in all other conditions that I've tried and I am finding them to suit my local (East Coast) conditions much more than I could have expected.

I expect that sales on the '09 Aura will be brisk as soon as it's available for purchase.
 

dloveski

Ski Diva Extraordinaire
vanhoskier just found a screaming deal for me on Craigslist, 2007 Auras for $299 with bindings.

The length is 170. I am on 166 in Atomic Sugar Mamas and my Pocket Rockets and Head Sweet Fats.

Is 170 in the Auras a good length? the deal seems sweet.
 

ski now work later

Ski Diva Extraordinaire
Angel Diva
Because you live in Utah and ski so much powder and chop, I think the 170s should be fine if you're used to 166. I am an intermediate skier so I bought the 163s because they felt like more than enough ski for me, and they don't feel long at all even though my other Volkls are 156. They are very flexible for wide boards, and if I lived out West, I might have considered the 170s for float in pow. Anyway, at $299 you can't go wrong, as long as you like the graphics on the '07 model.

FYI, I am 5'7", 145 lbs. if that's helpful.

Happy shopping!
 

volklgirl

Ski Diva Extraordinaire
:love: Another day of Love! :love:

We went to Nub's Nob on Friday and ripped it up from 9:30 'til last chair. At first I thought I was going to take the Auras back to the car and grab my Karmas instead, but I'm glad I didn't.

At 9:30 we had frozen corduroy that made everybody's skis vibrate under foot until the bottom of our feet were numb. The Auras weren't thrilled with this, but agressive forward pressure and high edge angles had them biting in almost as well as my race skis. They happily whipped off short, medium and long turns with plenty of pop. I still feel that my 3/8" rear mount plays at least some part in their distaste for really hard snow, but I figured out if the tips get weird, it just means I'm getting lazy and ending up in the back seat :nono: .

By 11:30 things had softened up considerably and we began venturing into the glades and the bumps. WOW. These skis just zip through that stuff with ease.

By 2:30 we had the beginnings of glop and mashed potatoes and the Auras were happy as pigs-in-slop! I followed the guys all over the mountain, including stuff I usually back away from (not because I can't do it, only because the consequences usually aren't worth it and I don't feel that I have anything to prove :rolleyes: ). Yet, these skis just make all that scary crap soooo easy for me. The guys say my confidence level has really jumped up since I started riding the Auras. :thumbsup: I even took a couple of smooth runs through the steep mogul field on Twilight Zone!

By the end of the day, I was the only one on skis wide enough to be really happy in the deepening slop.....and very, very happy I was!!! :yahoo:
 

sibhusky

Ski Diva Extraordinaire
For what it's worth, my daughter, a former FIS racer, is extremely happy with her 2007-2008 Auras. Occasionally she's talked about changing the edge angle from 2 degrees to her normal 3 degrees, because she's getting chatter (she calls it chutter for some reason, maybe I'm out of it) at speed on slopes with sheer hardpack. I've told her I don't think it will solve that problem, which I feel is also due to it being a softer ski, not a race ski. Those are the only conditions she has issues with. If she wants to rip it on the groomers she needs to reach for her SG, SL, or GS skis, not the Auras.

She now will follow me into the woods without issues about her skis. She used to be able to do this stuff on her old K2 Mach SL race skis (from long ago, boy did those things get a lot of use), but without the same level of enjoyment she has now.

I think the Auras are great skis for the aggressive and skilled woman. This is a big statement on my part as I've never found a woman's ski before that I'd even consider, since I weigh too much myself (IMO) for a woman's ski. But if I needed a powder ski (which I don't at the moment) this is the ski I'd buy in a flash. It's a great confidence builder and just plain FUN.
 

volklgirl

Ski Diva Extraordinaire
For what it's worth, my daughter, a former FIS racer, is extremely happy with her 2007-2008 Auras. Occasionally she's talked about changing the edge angle from 2 degrees to her normal 3 degrees, because she's getting chatter (she calls it chutter for some reason, maybe I'm out of it) at speed on slopes with sheer hardpack. I've told her I don't think it will solve that problem, which I feel is also due to it being a softer ski, not a race ski. Those are the only conditions she has issues with. If she wants to rip it on the groomers she needs to reach for her SG, SL, or GS skis, not the Auras.
I get the same chatter. Driving forward agressively keeps it to a miminum, but I don't think it will be cured with an edge angle change (although I will be changing mine from 2 to 3 also just because the extra grip is a plus in the midwest). I think what causes it with this ski is the odd combination of fairly stiff but really wide and light. It just seems to make the tips really vibrative (making up my own words here :p ).
 

vanhoskier

Ski Diva Extraordinaire
I WANT THESE SKIS!!!!!! Even though I live on the East Coast, they seem SO MUCH FUN for crud and slush (and oh yes we have that) and then the powder days that I do occasionally have. PLUS, I'm planning on more trips in the future since I know about more divas out there!!!

I kind of like the 2009 graphic. It reminds me of a Japanese lady. The graphic is spread over both skis. (The 2007 graphic is still the best and classiest).

Anyway, I'm a strong skier. 165 lbs. 5'10". I already have a 90mm waist ski (Celebrity) so I'm thinking the 177's will be best for me.

(Geez, it's April and I'm done skiing for the year and here I am, sitting here while my students are taking a test and I'm supposed to be grading papers and I'm talking about buying Aura's for next year!!!! Addict! Addict! Addict! I'm hopeless.......:redface: ) Volklgirl, it's ALL YOUR FAULT (just kidding:becky: ).

HEY, did dloveski pick up the Aura's from the SLC Craigslist???

THOUGHTS on lengths for a gal like me????
 

skigrl27

Ski Diva Extraordinaire
Wait...so you tried the Mantras too, yes? And....
 

volklgirl

Ski Diva Extraordinaire
I WANT THESE SKIS!!!!!! Anyway, I'm a strong skier. 165 lbs. 5'10". I already have a 90mm waist ski (Celebrity) so I'm thinking the 177's will be best for me.
THOUGHTS on lengths for a gal like me????
For a crud and slush ski, yes, 177.

For an all around/all condition, the 163 was much more agile.
 

vanhoskier

Ski Diva Extraordinaire
No, did not try the Mantras. Should I????

They are the "men's" version, right? So they have a stiffer core?
 

volklgirl

Ski Diva Extraordinaire
Wait...so you tried the Mantras too, yes? And....
Yes I did. I demoed the Mantra in a 170 and found that is was more than I wanted to deal with for an entire day. The Aura (even at 163) had the same stability and crud busting ability without the Mantra's stiff, heavy feeling. The Mantra tended to toss me around anytime I wasn't driving it full-on. Some days that's OK, but some days I just want to be able to relax.

You'll find my comparison HERE
 

ski now work later

Ski Diva Extraordinaire
Angel Diva
Vanhoskier, you know that I like a twin tip ski and want to be able to hit some jumps in the park in my all mountain ski. My Auras (163) make me want to jump so much more than my park skis do, and they are stable and give me confidence in all conditions I've tried so far except sheer icy hard pack. I like the shorter length so I can venture into the bumps and trees, but still handle hard pack, rip down groomers, bust through crud, and take some air. They are more of an all mountain ski than any other ski I've tried. I can't say enough about them. I'll keep using my park ski for freestyle lessons and practice, I'll use my shorter Volkl AC2s for very icy days and when I'm out with my kids and need to go slower, but I expect to ski the Auras most of the time next season.

I think you will love the '09 graphic and you have the style to go with them. If you lived out West, I'd say go 177 for pow skiing, but here in the Northeast, you might find the 170 more versatile. My only warning: your Lines will be lonely because once you ski the Auras, you'll rarely want to ski your other sticks!

:ski2:
 

vanhoskier

Ski Diva Extraordinaire
I think you will love the '09 graphic and you have the style to go with them. If you lived out West, I'd say go 177 for pow skiing, but here in the Northeast, you might find the 170 more versatile. My only warning: your Lines will be lonely because once you ski the Auras, you'll rarely want to ski your other sticks!

:ski2:

Awwwww.....you mean I have style???? Geez....:redface: I'm blushing! Well, I don't want my Lines to be lonely because I do LOVE them....:love: ....so that's why I was thinking 177's for an Aura. My Lines are 172 and I could handle more length. They are very versatile and maneuverable at 172. I'll have to think about it. Not that there isn't a lot of time!!!!!:becky:

SNWL, I'm glad you are feeling better and able to chat with us here!:clap: Keep on healing up!
 

volklgirl

Ski Diva Extraordinaire
My Auras (163) make me want to jump so much more than my park skis do, and they are stable and give me confidence in all conditions I've tried so far except sheer icy hard pack. I like the shorter length so I can venture into the bumps and trees, but still handle hard pack, rip down groomers, bust through crud, and take some air. They are more of an all mountain ski than any other ski I've tried. I can't say enough about them.
Funny how that is, isn't it?
My only warning: your Lines will be lonely because once you ski the Auras, you'll rarely want to ski your other sticks!

:ski2:
Isn't that the truth! :faint:
 

Latest posts

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
27,589
Messages
526,914
Members
9,722
Latest member
ruby.aitken
Top